Madde 6.8 - Görünürdeki Gizli Tehlike?

Clause 6.8 of Kinesis’ Terms & Conditions allows the platform to unilaterally reverse transactions deemed “erroneous.” But what happens when such reversals occur months later, with no explanation — and only after significant profits have been made by a user?

What Clause 6.8 Says

“Kinesis reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to reverse any transaction determined to have been executed due to mispricing, erroneous or unintended trading conditions, and to claw back any funds, assets, or profits gained as a result of such transactions, with the intent of restoring the Parties to the financial position they would have been in had the error not occurred, including taking such actions without prior notice if necessary to protect the financial integrity of Kinesis.”

Clauses like this do exist - but wording, scope, and timing must be clear and fair.

Timeline of Events

During those two months, the trades remained visible, settled, and uncontested. The reversal came only after substantial profit was realized and after prolonged silence.

The Structural Risk

Clause 6.8, applied retroactively and without timely communication, introduces a serious structural risk for every user:

• What if your past trades are reversed weeks or months later?
• What if any transaction can be undone, depending on its profitability?
• How do you trust a system that lacks predictable resolution procedures?

Wider Implications

This clause not only affects traders. It potentially undermines the integrity of long-term investors, the credibility of Kinesis as an asset-backed system, and the perceived fairness of its market operations.

Why Clause 6.8 Is a Problem for Everyone

Clause 6.8 allows Kinesis to cancel your trades - even after they are completed - if they decide the trades happened under "wrong" conditions. They don't have to explain why, and they don't need your permission.

But here's the real issue:

• It didn't exist when many users joined. The clause was added later, quietly, and without proper notice.
• It can be used at any time, even months later. There's no clear limit on how far back Kinesis can go to cancel your trades.
• It's vague and one-sided. Kinesis decides what counts as a "bad" trade and keeps the profit if the trade goes in their favor.

Is that fair?

In most countries, financial services must follow rules: clear terms, fair notice, and protection of customer rights. Clause 6.8 ignores all of that.

This Affects Every User

Whether you're a trader or a long-term investor, this clause means your money is never really safe. If something goes wrong - or too well - Kinesis can undo it.

That's not transparency. That's risk, hidden in plain sight.

Conclusion

Trust is not just about security — it’s about transparency, consistency, and timely communication.

When profit leads to silence, and silence leads to retroactive punishment, users are left in a structurally uncertain system.

THIS IS NOT SOUND MONEY

Contact me

If you have had similar experiences, or if you are a journalist, regulator, concerned partner or even a competitor, feel free to reach out:

Email: